The third film in the Enola Holmes trilogy, Enola Holmes 3, may come as a surprise, though I was still somewhat looking forward to it. As someone who felt the second film was an improvement on the original, I unfortunately found Enola Holmes 3 to be the weakest entry in the series.
Millie Bobby Brown returns as Enola Holmes, alongside Henry Cavill, Helena Bonham Carter, and Louis Partridge. This time, however, the story shifts to a new location, as the film is set in Malta, where Enola is due to be married. On her way to the wedding, she learns that her brother Sherlock has been abducted, prompting her to become a runaway bride and abandon the ceremony to find him. While this premise initially seems like a step up in terms of stakes, the change in setting makes London feel noticeably absent, and several characters appear somewhat out of place. As a result, the performances often felt exaggerated and, at times, a little forced. Additionally, the investigative element of the story did not quite work for me, as someone who enjoys the mystery aspect of Holmes adaptations, I found this instalment to be overly predictable.
It felt as though Netflix was aiming for something more ambitious with a third instalment, especially with Jack Thorne as writer and Phillip Barantini known for Adolescence and Boiling Point as director. However, the final result feels as though it could have been directed by almost anyone, lacking a distinct creative identity and feeling somewhat restrained overall. As mentioned, this is easily my least favourite entry in the trilogy.
Overall, while there are some enjoyable moments, the stakes, performances, and emotional drive feel noticeably absent, and I suspect it will not be remembered as strongly as the first two films.
Review by Eccy
Philip Barantini, I hope your next passion project is big enough to earn you a much better “one for them, one for me” deal than this.
When I say that, it’s because the film truly struggles. Louis Partridge delivers such a lifeless performance that I genuinely started wondering whether Tewkesbury had died off screen and become a figment of Enola’s imagination. Whatever criticisms people have of Millie Bobby Brown, at least she looks like she’s trying.
The biggest issue is how repetitive it all feels. Revisiting another kidnapping centred around the Holmes family makes the third instalment feel creatively stagnant and tedious rather than progression of the series.
Add in a painfully weak portrayal of British colonialism and a forgettable Moriarty portrayal, and you’re left with a mystery that’s far less interesting than the film thinks it is. A truly abysmal use of the source material, the Sherlock Holmes characters, and ultimately the talent behind it.
Review by Epicz